| [2015] FWCA 6854 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Greenstar Interior Solutions Pty Ltd
(AG2015/4930)
GREENSTAR INTERIOR SOLUTIONS (ONSITE AND OFFSITE) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 5 OCTOBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the Greenstar Interior Solutions (Onsite and Offsite) Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Greenstar Interior Solutions (Onsite and Offsite) Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Greenstar Interior Solutions Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 5 October 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 12 October 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 5 October 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE416017 PR572591>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- Greenstar Interior Solutions Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 6854
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6854
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the Commission had given adequate consideration to the applicant's submissions and whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the applicant argued that the Commission had not properly considered their submissions regarding the procedural fairness of the process and had failed to address key aspects of the agreement that impacted employees' rights and entitlements.
The court found that the Commission had indeed failed to properly consider the applicant's submissions, leading to a procedural unfairness. Additionally, the court identified that certain provisions of the agreement were not in compliance with the statutory requirements for approval. These provisions failed to adequately protect the rights and entitlements of employees as required by the Act. Consequently, the court ruled that the application for approval should be dismissed, and the agreement could not be approved in its current form. Further amendments would be necessary to address both procedural and substantive fairness concerns before it could be reconsidered.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.