Greenfield & Conley (No 3)

In the matter of *Greenfield & Conley (No 3)*, heard before Young J, the applicant, Mr Greenfield, and the respondent, Ms Conley, were involved in proceedings before the court. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, however, the court was required to make an order concerning the progression of a contravention application filed by the mother.

The central legal issue before the court was the procedural step of allowing the mother's contravention application to proceed to a hearing. This involved considering the appropriate listing of the matter and implicitly, the court's jurisdiction to hear and determine such applications within the framework of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth).

Young J ordered that the mother's contravention application was to proceed and was listed for hearing on 30 July 2021. This decision indicates that the court found sufficient grounds for the application to be heard on its merits, notwithstanding any potential preliminary objections or considerations. The court's order also serves as a reminder of the strictures imposed by section 121 of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) regarding the publication of identifying details in family law proceedings.