| [2021] FWCA 6986 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Graymont (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2021/8196)
GRAYMONT (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD TAMAREE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021
Quarrying industry | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 6 DECEMBER 2021 |
Application for approval of the Graymont (Australia) Pty Ltd Tamaree Enterprise Agreement 2021
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Graymont (Australia) Pty Ltd Tamaree Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Graymont (Australia) Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] Noting the undertakings provided, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES in the Act will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE514160 PR736444>
- AGLC
- Graymont (Australia) Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 6986
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 6986
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable process for resolving disputes between the employer and employees, whether it provided for a fair and reasonable classification of employees, and whether it provided for appropriate penalty rates. The Commission found that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable process for resolving disputes, as it included a clause that required the parties to attempt to resolve any disputes through conciliation before resorting to arbitration. The Commission also found that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable classification of employees, as it included a clause that required the employer to consult with the union before making any changes to the classification of employees. However, the Commission found that the agreement did not provide for appropriate penalty rates, as it did not provide for penalty rates for work on public holidays or for work outside of normal hours.
The Commission approved the agreement with some modifications to the penalty rates clause. The employer and the union were directed to negotiate in good faith to reach an agreement on the penalty rates for work on public holidays and for work outside of normal hours. The Commission found that the agreement, as modified, met the requirements of the Act and was in the best interests of the employees. The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the agreement with modifications to the penalty rates clause, and a direction for the parties to negotiate in good faith to reach an agreement on the penalty rates.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.