Grant and Aiden (No 8)
Case
•
[2016] FamCA 655
•29 April 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Grant and Aiden (No 8) [2016] FamCA 655
[2016] FamCA 655
29 April 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Grant and Aiden (No 8)*, Cronin J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application for an adjournment.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the application for an adjournment should be granted.
Cronin J refused the application for an adjournment. No further reasoning or legal principles were provided in the excerpt.
The court ordered that the application for an adjournment be refused.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the application for an adjournment should be granted.
Cronin J refused the application for an adjournment. No further reasoning or legal principles were provided in the excerpt.
The court ordered that the application for an adjournment be refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Grant and Aiden (No 8) [2016] FamCA 655
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1