Grant and Aiden (No 6)
Case
•
[2016] FamCA 314
•29 April 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Grant and Aiden (No 6) [2016] FamCA 314
[2016] FamCA 314
29 April 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Grant and Aiden (No 6)*, Cronin J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application for an adjournment.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the adjournment sought by one of the parties.
Cronin J refused the application for an adjournment, indicating that the matter would proceed. The reasons for this refusal are not detailed in the provided extract, but the order clearly signifies the court's decision to move forward with the proceedings.
The court ordered that the application for an adjournment be refused.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the adjournment sought by one of the parties.
Cronin J refused the application for an adjournment, indicating that the matter would proceed. The reasons for this refusal are not detailed in the provided extract, but the order clearly signifies the court's decision to move forward with the proceedings.
The court ordered that the application for an adjournment be refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Grant and Aiden (No 6) [2016] FamCA 314
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1