Grant and Aiden (No 2)
Case
•
[2017] FamCA 833
•1 September 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Grant and Aiden (No 2) [2017] FamCA 833
[2017] FamCA 833
1 September 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Grant and Aiden (No 2)*, Austin J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered an application filed by the mother concerning her children. The father was the respondent to this application.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the mother's application should be granted. The court was required to determine the merits of the mother's application and, in light of that determination, consider the question of costs.
Austin J dismissed the mother's application. The court ordered that the mother pay the father's costs of and incidental to the hearing of the failed application on a party/party basis. The Independent Children's Lawyer's application for costs against the mother was also dismissed pursuant to s 117(4)(b) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth).
The central legal issue before the court was whether the mother's application should be granted. The court was required to determine the merits of the mother's application and, in light of that determination, consider the question of costs.
Austin J dismissed the mother's application. The court ordered that the mother pay the father's costs of and incidental to the hearing of the failed application on a party/party basis. The Independent Children's Lawyer's application for costs against the mother was also dismissed pursuant to s 117(4)(b) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth).
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Grant and Aiden (No 2) [2017] FamCA 833
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
3