Granger and Collett
Case
•
[2007] FamCA 864
•16 August 2007
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Granger and Collett [2007] FamCA 864
[2007] FamCA 864
16 August 2007
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Granger and Collett*, Strickland J of the Family Court of Australia considered applications for final orders filed by the father. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties, beyond the father's applications for final orders, is not detailed in the provided text.
The court was required to determine the immediate procedural steps necessary to advance the father's applications for final orders. This involved setting a timetable for the mother to respond to the father's filed documents and scheduling a future hearing date before a different judge.
Strickland J ordered that further consideration of the father's applications be adjourned to a specific date and time before Justice Dawe. The mother was directed to file and serve her responses and supporting affidavit by a specified date prior to the adjourned hearing. The question of the husband's costs in relation to the current hearing was reserved for determination at the adjourned hearing.
The court was required to determine the immediate procedural steps necessary to advance the father's applications for final orders. This involved setting a timetable for the mother to respond to the father's filed documents and scheduling a future hearing date before a different judge.
Strickland J ordered that further consideration of the father's applications be adjourned to a specific date and time before Justice Dawe. The mother was directed to file and serve her responses and supporting affidavit by a specified date prior to the adjourned hearing. The question of the husband's costs in relation to the current hearing was reserved for determination at the adjourned hearing.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Granger and Collett [2007] FamCA 864
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0