Graham and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review)
Case
•
[2019] AATA 2480
•2 August 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Graham and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2019] AATA 2480
[2019] AATA 2480
2 August 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application by Graham for Family Tax Benefit (FTB) top-up and supplement payments for the 2012-2013 income year. The Secretary of the Department of Social Services had refused the application, and the applicant sought a review of that decision before A Poljak SM. The core of the dispute revolved around whether the applicant's partner had lodged his income tax return by the statutory date, and if not, whether special circumstances prevented him from doing so.
The legal issues before the court were whether the applicant was entitled to FTB top-up and supplement payments, which depended on whether her partner had lodged his income tax return by the statutory deadline. Crucially, the court had to determine if any special circumstances existed that would excuse the late lodgement of the partner's tax return, thereby allowing the discretion under paragraph 32C(2)(b) of the relevant Act to be exercised in the applicant's favour.
The Senior Member found that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to establish special circumstances that prevented her partner from lodging his 2012-2013 income tax return by 30 June 2014. While the applicant cited relationship breakdown, business issues, and the storage of paperwork as potential reasons for the delay, the Senior Member was not persuaded that these circumstances were out of the ordinary or that they definitively prevented lodgement. Without further explanation from the partner, the Senior Member concluded that the discretion under paragraph 32C(2)(b) of the Act could not be applied. Consequently, the applicant was not entitled to the FTB supplement and top-up payments for the relevant income year, and the decision under review was affirmed.
The legal issues before the court were whether the applicant was entitled to FTB top-up and supplement payments, which depended on whether her partner had lodged his income tax return by the statutory deadline. Crucially, the court had to determine if any special circumstances existed that would excuse the late lodgement of the partner's tax return, thereby allowing the discretion under paragraph 32C(2)(b) of the relevant Act to be exercised in the applicant's favour.
The Senior Member found that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to establish special circumstances that prevented her partner from lodging his 2012-2013 income tax return by 30 June 2014. While the applicant cited relationship breakdown, business issues, and the storage of paperwork as potential reasons for the delay, the Senior Member was not persuaded that these circumstances were out of the ordinary or that they definitively prevented lodgement. Without further explanation from the partner, the Senior Member concluded that the discretion under paragraph 32C(2)(b) of the Act could not be applied. Consequently, the applicant was not entitled to the FTB supplement and top-up payments for the relevant income year, and the decision under review was affirmed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Statutory Construction
-
Appeal
-
Natural Justice
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Graham and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2019] AATA 2480
Most Recent Citation
CJBX and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social security second review) [2025] ARTA 690
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
0
Secretary, Department of Social Services and Jason Cooper
[2015] AATA 41