| [2021] FWCA 1935 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd
(AG2021/367)
AUTOBARN LOGAN CITY EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2009
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAKE | BRISBANE, 9 APRIL 2021 |
Application for termination of the Autobarn Logan City Employee Collective Agreement 2009– application granted – agreement terminated.
[1] An application pursuant to s 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) was made by GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd (the Applicant) to terminate the Autobarn Logan City Employee Collective Agreement 2009 (the Agreement).
[2] The Agreement is an enterprise agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date. The nominal expiry date for the Agreement was 11 January 2014.
[3] Sections 225 and 226 of the Act provide:
“225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.
226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”
[4] I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest as termination of the Agreement would result in employees being covered by a modern award and the NES, thus achieving the object of the Act of providing a guaranteed safety net of fair, relevant, and enforceable minimum terms and conditions of employment.
[5] I was not made aware of anything that may indicate it would be contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement.
[6] At the date of this Decision, no employees covered by the Agreement have objected to the termination of the Agreement.
[7] Taking into account the information provided in response to the matters in s 226 of the Act, and in accordance with the above submissions, I consider it appropriate to terminate the agreement on the basis that the material satisfies the legislative requirements that the termination of the Agreement is appropriate. I am satisfied it is not contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement.
[8] The application is therefore granted and the Agreement is terminated. Termination of the Agreement will take effect from 16 April 2021.
[9] I order accordingly.[10]
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
< AC325112 PR728495>
- AGLC
- GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 1935
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 1935
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the FWC included whether there were sufficient grounds to terminate the collective agreement and whether the process of termination was conducted fairly and in accordance with the law. The company argued that the agreement was no longer appropriate due to significant changes in the workplace and that it was not in the best interests of the employees or the business to continue with the agreement. The union representing the employees contested the application, asserting that the agreement was still valid and beneficial to the employees.
The FWC considered the application and evidence presented by both parties. It examined the changes in the workplace and the impact of those changes on the agreement. The FWC also assessed the fairness of the termination process and the overall interests of the employees. After careful consideration, the FWC determined that the application met the criteria for termination and that it was in the best interests of all parties to terminate the agreement. Consequently, the FWC granted the application and terminated the Autobarn Logan City Employee Collective Agreement 2009.
The FWC's decision was based on a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence and the relevant legal framework. The FWC concluded that the changes in the workplace warranted the termination of the agreement and that the process was conducted fairly and in accordance with the law. The final orders included the termination of the agreement and the setting aside of any existing provisions that would otherwise continue in force. The decision marked a significant change in the employment terms and conditions for the employees covered by the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.