Gorrick v NSW Police
Case
•
[2011] NSWSC 1312
•02 September 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Gorrick v NSW Police [2011] NSWSC 1312
[2011] NSWSC 1312
02 September 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Gorrick v NSW Police, the plaintiff sought to appeal his conviction in the Supreme Court after his plea of guilty in the Local Court. The plaintiff was out of time to appeal to the District Court, so he sought to appeal directly to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court considered whether it had the power to make an order allowing the plaintiff to appeal to the District Court. The court found that it did not have such power under the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001.
The legal issue before the court was whether the Supreme Court had the power to make an order that the plaintiff be allowed to appeal to the District Court, despite being out of time to do so. The court considered whether the power to make such an order was implied in the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001, or whether it was an error in the court's previous decision to allow the appeal. The court found that the power to make such an order was not available under the Act, and that it was not an error in the previous decision.
The court noted that where a defendant had entered a plea of guilty in the Local Court, and had legal representation, the proper course of action was to appeal to the District Court within the prescribed time limit. If the defendant was unable to appeal to the District Court within the time limit, they could seek leave to appeal directly to the Supreme Court. However, the court did not have the power to make an order that a defendant who was out of time to appeal to the District Court be allowed to do so. The court emphasised that this was not an error in the previous decision, but rather a limitation on the court's power under the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001.
The court found that the plaintiff's appeal to the Supreme Court was not valid, and dismissed the appeal. The court did not make an order allowing the plaintiff to appeal to the District Court, as it did not have the power to do so. The court also made observations concerning the proper procedure for appealing a conviction to the Supreme Court where a plea of guilty had been entered in the Local Court by a represented defendant.
The legal issue before the court was whether the Supreme Court had the power to make an order that the plaintiff be allowed to appeal to the District Court, despite being out of time to do so. The court considered whether the power to make such an order was implied in the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001, or whether it was an error in the court's previous decision to allow the appeal. The court found that the power to make such an order was not available under the Act, and that it was not an error in the previous decision.
The court noted that where a defendant had entered a plea of guilty in the Local Court, and had legal representation, the proper course of action was to appeal to the District Court within the prescribed time limit. If the defendant was unable to appeal to the District Court within the time limit, they could seek leave to appeal directly to the Supreme Court. However, the court did not have the power to make an order that a defendant who was out of time to appeal to the District Court be allowed to do so. The court emphasised that this was not an error in the previous decision, but rather a limitation on the court's power under the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001.
The court found that the plaintiff's appeal to the Supreme Court was not valid, and dismissed the appeal. The court did not make an order allowing the plaintiff to appeal to the District Court, as it did not have the power to do so. The court also made observations concerning the proper procedure for appealing a conviction to the Supreme Court where a plea of guilty had been entered in the Local Court by a represented defendant.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Plea of Guilty
-
Limitation Periods
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Gorrick v NSW Police [2011] NSWSC 1312
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
6
Wong v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)
[2005] NSWSC 129
Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Yeo
[2008] NSWSC 953
Thalari v R
[2009] NSWCCA 170