GOODWIN & RONEY

In the matter of *Goodwin & Roney*, heard by Cleary J, the proceedings concerned an interim application brought by the father and a related interim application brought by the mother. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties regarding their child is not detailed in the provided text, beyond the fact that it led to these interim applications.

The court was required to determine the applications made by both the father and the mother. Additionally, the court was tasked with making orders concerning the child's contact with the maternal grandfather, Mr B Roney, and the role of the Independent Children’s Lawyer in relation to a Single Expert.

Cleary J ordered the withdrawal and dismissal of the father's interim application and the dismissal of the mother's interim application. By consent of the parties, the mother was restrained from bringing the child into contact with the maternal grandfather, Mr B Roney, or allowing third parties to facilitate such contact. Furthermore, the Independent Children’s Lawyer was directed to provide the Child Inclusive Conference Memorandum and the court's orders and reasons to the Single Expert.