Gone Farming v Long

Gone Farming brought an application to set aside a statutory demand issued by Long. Gone Farming contended that there were matters of principle involved in the application, warranting judicial intervention. The court was required to determine whether the application to set aside the statutory demand involved any matters of principle that would entitle the applicant to set aside the demand. The court held that the application did not involve any matters of principle and was thus a straightforward application. The court found that the application was a routine one, and that the only issues were factual and did not involve any legal principles that warranted judicial intervention. The court dismissed the application and ordered Gone Farming to pay Long's costs. The court found that there were no matters of principle involved in the application, and that the applicant had not provided any evidence to support its contention that there were such matters. The court held that the application was a routine one, and that the only issues were factual and did not involve any legal principles that warranted judicial intervention. The court dismissed the application and ordered Gone Farming to pay Long's costs.