Gomez and Easton (No 2)
Case
•
[2017] FamCA 299
•12 May 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Gomez and Easton (No 2) [2017] FamCA 299
[2017] FamCA 299
12 May 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Gomez and Easton (No 2)*, Carew J of the Supreme Court of New South Wales considered an application for costs. The application sought costs of and incidental to an earlier Initiating Application filed in June 2015.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant was entitled to an order for costs in relation to the earlier proceedings.
Carew J dismissed the application for costs. The reasons for this dismissal are not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the Court found no basis to award the costs sought by the applicant.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant was entitled to an order for costs in relation to the earlier proceedings.
Carew J dismissed the application for costs. The reasons for this dismissal are not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the Court found no basis to award the costs sought by the applicant.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Gomez and Easton (No 2) [2017] FamCA 299
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
2
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
[1998] HCA 11
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty ltd
[1993] FCA 801
Yunghanns v Yunghanns
[2000] FamCA 681