[2016] FWCA 1582
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
Goldsprings Earthmoving and Heavy Haulage Pty Ltd
(AG2015/6017)
GOLDSPRINGS EARTHMOVING AND HEAVY HAULAGE PTY
LIMITED PLANT OPERATORS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT
Building, metal and civil construction industries
| COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 11 MARCH 2016 |
Application for termination of the Goldsprings Earthmoving and Heavy Haulage Pty Limited
Plant Operators Enterprise Agreement.
[1] On 30 October 2015, Goldsprings Earthmoving and Heavy Haulage Pty Ltd made an
application to terminate the Goldsprings Earthmoving and Heavy Haulage Pty Limited Plant
Operators Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement) under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the
Act).
[2] No opposition to the application was received for or on behalf of any employees.
Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the
matters contained in s.226 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the Agreement is terminated.
[3] The termination will come into effect from 11 March 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE894261 PR577934>
- AGLC
- Goldsprings Earthmoving and Heavy Haulage Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 1582
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 1582
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue that the court had to decide was whether the application for termination of the enterprise agreement was justified under the Fair Work Act 2009. The court had to consider the matters outlined in section 226 of the Act before deciding whether to terminate the agreement. The court also had to consider if there was any opposition to the application from the employees.
The court found that the application for termination of the enterprise agreement was justified under section 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court was satisfied that all the matters outlined in section 226 of the Act were met, and there was no opposition to the application from the employees. The court therefore terminated the agreement and the termination came into effect from 11 March 2016.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.