Goldman and Goldman
Case
•
[2020] FamCA 275
•24 April 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Goldman and Goldman [2020] FamCA 275
[2020] FamCA 275
24 April 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Goldman and Goldman*, heard by Cleary J, the dispute concerned costs following earlier proceedings between the applicant father and the respondent mother. The court was required to determine which party should bear the costs associated with specific court events, namely the trial conducted over several days in February and March 2017, and the mother's application to re-open evidence in June 2017.
Cleary J ordered that the respondent mother pay the applicant father's costs on a party/party basis for the trial and the application to re-open evidence. The court also dismissed both the Application in a Case filed by the mother in July 2017 and the Response to the Application in a Case filed by the father in August 2017.
Cleary J ordered that the respondent mother pay the applicant father's costs on a party/party basis for the trial and the application to re-open evidence. The court also dismissed both the Application in a Case filed by the mother in July 2017 and the Response to the Application in a Case filed by the father in August 2017.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Goldman and Goldman [2020] FamCA 275
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Goldman and Goldman (No 4)
[2017] FamCA 678
Goldman and Goldman
[2017] FamCA 551