Goldman and Goldman (No 3)
Case
•
[2017] FamCA 677
•27 February 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Goldman and Goldman (No 3) [2017] FamCA 677
[2017] FamCA 677
27 February 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Cleary J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia heard an application concerning the welfare of a child. The dispute involved the Respondent mother, who sought an adjournment of proceedings.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the Respondent mother's oral application for an adjournment of the proceedings.
Cleary J dismissed the application for adjournment. The reasons for this decision are not detailed in the provided text.
The court ordered that the oral application for adjournment made on behalf of the Respondent mother be dismissed.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the Respondent mother's oral application for an adjournment of the proceedings.
Cleary J dismissed the application for adjournment. The reasons for this decision are not detailed in the provided text.
The court ordered that the oral application for adjournment made on behalf of the Respondent mother be dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0