Golden Circle Ltd

Case [2020] FWCA 23


[2020] FWCA 23
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Golden Circle Ltd
(AG2019/4385)

GOLDERN CIRCLE LIMITED - MAINTENANCE AND CLERICAL - ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER HUNT

BRISBANE, 3 JANUARY 2020

Application for approval of the Golden Circle Limited - Maintenance and Clerical - Enterprise Agreement 2019.

[1] Golden Circle Limited (the Employer) has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Golden Circle Limited – Maintenance and Clerical – Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The Fair Work Commission (the Commission) raised certain concerns regarding the Agreement with the Employer, and as a result, the Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A. Pursuant to s.190(4) of the Act I sought the views of the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU), the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) regarding the undertakings provided by the Employer; each of them being bargaining representatives for the Agreement.

[3] The CEPU wrote to my chambers and indicated that it had no objections to the Employer’s undertakings. The AMWU did not provide its views on all of the Employer’s undertakings. Rather, the AMWU wrote to my chambers and provided its views on some of the Employer’s responses to the issues of concern raised by the Commission regarding the Agreement. The CFMMEU did not provide its views on any of the Employer’s undertakings.

[4] I indicated to the parties my view that the Agreement’s existing consultation term did not meet the requirements of s.205(1)(a)(i) of the Act, and that in the event of approval the model consultation term will be inserted into the Agreement.

[5] It is noted that the expression “including malingering, inefficiency, inefficiency, or neglect of duty” found in Clause 28.8 of the Agreement are not terms within the meaning of serious misconduct pursuant to r.1.07 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (the Regulations). As a result, the term of Clause 28.8 of the Agreement is likely an unenforceable term contrary to s.194(d) of the Act.

[6] With respect to Clause 33.1 of the Agreement, it is noted that the expression “all matters of concern regarding their employment conditions and circumstances” is taken to include, but not be limited to, the National Employment Standards (NES) and matters arising under the Agreement.

[7] With respect to Appendix 2, Clause 26.2 of the Agreement, it is noted that the term will only apply to the extent that it is not inconsistent with the NES, per the undertaking provided by the Employer.

[8] With respect to Appendix 2, Clause 27.2.2 of the Agreement, it is noted that the term will only apply to the extent that it is not inconsistent with the NES, per the undertaking provided by the Employer.

[9] I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act I note that the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[10] I have taken into consideration the material filed in the Commission. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account s.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[11] Pursuant to s 205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Regulations is attached to the Agreement and taken to be a term of it.

[12] The AMWU, the CEPU and the CFMMEU being bargaining representatives for the Agreement have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the AMWU, the CEPU and the CFMMEU.

[13] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 January 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2022.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE506664  PR715684>
Annexure A:

Details
AGLC
Golden Circle Ltd [2020] FWCA 23
Case
[2020] FWCA 23
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Golden Circle Limited sought approval for its Maintenance and Clerical Enterprise Agreement 2019 from the Fair Work Commission. The application was made in response to the union's dissatisfaction with certain terms and conditions, which led to the dispute being heard in the Fair Work Commission. The primary issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether it provided for a safety net of minimum wages and conditions and if it was fairly negotiated.

The Commission examined the proposed agreement's provisions to ensure they provided for a safety net of minimum wages and conditions. It also assessed whether the agreement was fairly negotiated, taking into account the bargaining power of both parties and the context in which the agreement was made. The union argued that certain terms were unfair and did not adequately protect its members, while Golden Circle Limited contended that the agreement was reasonable and in line with industry standards.

In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement did provide for a safety net of minimum wages and conditions and was fairly negotiated. The Commission was satisfied that the parties had engaged in good faith bargaining and that the agreement reflected the commercial realities of the enterprise. The union's concerns about certain terms were addressed through modifications to the agreement, ensuring that it met the legal requirements.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Maintenance and Clerical - Enterprise Agreement 2019, subject to the modifications made during the hearing. The approval was effective from the date of the decision, and both parties were bound by the terms of the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.