Goff’s Refrigeration & Airconditioning Installation Pty Ltd Summary

[2014] FWCA 7562

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Goff’s Refrigeration & Airconditioning Installation Pty Ltd
(AG2014/7720)

GOFF’S REFRIGERATION & AIRCONDITIONING INSTALLATION PTY LTD WHEATSTONE PROJECT AGREEMENT 2014

Building, metal and civil construction industries
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS	PERTH, 27 OCTOBER 2014

Application for approval of the Goff’s Refrigeration & Airconditioning Installation Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Goff’s Refrigeration & Airconditioning Installation Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Goff’s Refrigeration & Airconditioning Installation Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement does not contain a flexibility term. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 1 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 3 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 27 October 2018.

COMMISSIONER

1 Section 2.08 and Schedule 2.2 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Goff’s Refrigeration & Airconditioning Installation Pty Ltd sought approval for the Goff’s Refrigeration & Airconditioning Installation Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014. The application was brought before the Court to determine whether the agreement met the necessary legal criteria for approval. The case involved the interpretation of statutory provisions concerning project agreements and the application of relevant legal principles to ascertain whether the agreement was in the public interest.

The court was required to decide if the agreement was in compliance with the statutory requirements for project agreements and whether it was in the public interest. Key issues included the interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions, the assessment of the agreement against these provisions, and the determination of whether the agreement met the criteria for approval.

The court examined the statutory framework governing project agreements and applied it to the specific terms of the Wheatstone Project Agreement. The court found that the agreement was in compliance with the statutory requirements and that it was in the public interest. The court considered the potential benefits of the project, including economic and employment benefits, and weighed these against any potential detriments. The court concluded that the public interest was served by the approval of the agreement, as the benefits outweighed the detriments.

The court approved the Goff’s Refrigeration & Airconditioning Installation Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014, finding it to be in compliance with the statutory requirements and in the public interest. The court’s decision was based on a detailed analysis of the agreement and the relevant statutory provisions. The approval of the agreement was considered to be in the best interests of the public, given the potential benefits of the project.

Goff’s Refrigeration & Airconditioning Installation Pty Ltd

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established