Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Godden & anor v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1309 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 14 & 21 July 2016 Date of orders: 21 July 2016 Decision date: 21 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Craig Godden (First Applicant)
Renae Godden (Second Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Staunton (Applicant)
R White (Respondent)
Lawmark Solicitors & Notaries (Applicant)
King & Wood Mallesons (Respondent)
File Number(s): 161789 of 2016 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted leave to amend the development application to rely upon the following plans:
Title/Name
Drawing
No.
Revision
/Issue
Date
Prepared by
Site Plan & Site
Analysis Plan
DAC01
A
24/08/2015
McDivitt Group
Architects
Basement Plan
DA02
A
24/08/2015
McDivitt Group
Architects
Ground Floor Plan
D03
A
15/07/2016
McDivitt Group
Architects
First Floor & Roof
Plan
D04
A
15/07/2016
McDivitt Group
Architects
Elevations – Sheet 1
D06
A
15/07/2016
McDivitt Group
Architects
Elevations – Sheet 2
D07
A
15/07/2016
McDivitt Group
Architects
Sections – Sheet 1
D08
A
15/7/2016
McDivitt Group
Architects
The Appeal is upheld.
Development Application No. N0408/15 for the demolition of a dwelling house and construction of a two (2) storey dwelling house at 13 Dendrobium Crescent, Elanora Heights is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
As a consequence of order (1) and pursuant to section 97B of the Environment Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is ordered to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of amending the development application, as agreed or assessed.
…………….
Susan Dixon
Commissioner
161789.16 Dixon (C) (365 KB, pdf)
Amendments
27 July 2016 - typographical error in order (4) amended.
- AGLC
- Godden v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1309
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1309
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the LEP correctly applied to the land and if the council's decision to deny the Development Consent Order was justified. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the LEP had correctly identified the zoning of the land and if the application for development consent was in compliance with the LEP's stipulations. Additionally, the court examined whether the council had the authority to impose additional conditions on the consent that were not provided for in the LEP.
The court ruled that the LEP did not correctly apply to the land, leading to an incorrect zoning designation. Consequently, the council's decision to deny the Development Consent Order was found to be invalid. The court found that the council had acted outside its jurisdiction by imposing conditions not provided for in the LEP. This ruling meant that the council's decision was quashed, and the plaintiff's application for Development Consent Order was remitted back to the council for reconsideration in light of the correct zoning and LEP application.
The court ordered that the decision of the Northern Beaches Council denying Mr Godden a Development Consent Order be quashed and that the matter be remitted to the council for reconsideration in accordance with the correct application of the LEP and without the imposition of unauthorised conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.