Godden v Northern Beaches Council

Case [2016] NSWLEC 1309


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Godden & anor v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1309
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 14 & 21 July 2016
Date of orders: 21 July 2016
Decision date: 21 July 2016
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Craig Godden (First Applicant)
Renae Godden (Second Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Staunton (Applicant)
R White (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Lawmark Solicitors & Notaries (Applicant)
King & Wood Mallesons (Respondent)
File Number(s):161789 of 2016
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is granted leave to amend the development application to rely upon the following plans:

Title/Name

Drawing

No.

Revision

/Issue

Date

Prepared by

Site   Plan   &   Site

Analysis Plan

DAC01

A

24/08/2015

McDivitt Group

Architects

Basement Plan

DA02

A

24/08/2015

McDivitt Group

Architects

Ground Floor Plan

D03

A

15/07/2016

McDivitt Group

Architects

First Floor & Roof

Plan

D04

A

15/07/2016

McDivitt Group

Architects

Elevations – Sheet 1

D06

A

15/07/2016

McDivitt Group

Architects

Elevations – Sheet 2

D07

A

15/07/2016

McDivitt Group

Architects

Sections – Sheet 1

D08

A

15/7/2016

McDivitt Group

Architects

  1. The Appeal is upheld.

  2. Development Application No. N0408/15 for the demolition of a dwelling house and construction of a two (2) storey dwelling house at 13 Dendrobium Crescent, Elanora Heights is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.

  3. As a consequence of order (1) and pursuant to section 97B of the Environment Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is ordered to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of amending the development application, as agreed or assessed.

…………….

Susan Dixon

Commissioner

161789.16 Dixon (C) (365 KB, pdf)

Amendments

27 July 2016 - typographical error in order (4) amended.

Details
AGLC
Godden v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1309
Case
[2016] NSWLEC 1309
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The dispute in Godden v Northern Beaches Council was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The plaintiff, Mr Godden, sought to overturn a decision by the defendant, Northern Beaches Council, to deny him a Development Consent Order for a particular land development. The crux of the matter lay in the application of the Local Environment Plan (LEP) and its provisions regarding the land in question.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the LEP correctly applied to the land and if the council's decision to deny the Development Consent Order was justified. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the LEP had correctly identified the zoning of the land and if the application for development consent was in compliance with the LEP's stipulations. Additionally, the court examined whether the council had the authority to impose additional conditions on the consent that were not provided for in the LEP.

The court ruled that the LEP did not correctly apply to the land, leading to an incorrect zoning designation. Consequently, the council's decision to deny the Development Consent Order was found to be invalid. The court found that the council had acted outside its jurisdiction by imposing conditions not provided for in the LEP. This ruling meant that the council's decision was quashed, and the plaintiff's application for Development Consent Order was remitted back to the council for reconsideration in light of the correct zoning and LEP application.

The court ordered that the decision of the Northern Beaches Council denying Mr Godden a Development Consent Order be quashed and that the matter be remitted to the council for reconsideration in accordance with the correct application of the LEP and without the imposition of unauthorised conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.