Goater v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (No 2)
Case
•
[2014] NSWCA 412
•05 December 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Goater v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 412
[2014] NSWCA 412
05 December 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Goater v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (No 2)*, the applicants sought orders from the Court of Appeal of New South Wales, including that the Court make orders in respect of proceedings in the Common Law Division, following an earlier appeal where a default judgment against them had been set aside. The applicants also sought indemnity costs of the appeal, arguing that the respondent's conduct prior to the default judgment and as the unsuccessful respondent to the appeal justified such an order.
The primary legal issues before the Court were whether the conduct of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia prior to the default judgment, and its conduct as the unsuccessful respondent to the appeal, warranted an order for indemnity costs in favour of the applicants. The Court was also required to consider the applicants' request for the Court to make orders concerning the proceedings in the Common Law Division.
The Court dismissed the notice of motion filed by the applicants on 20 November 2014. Consequently, the applicants were ordered to pay the Bank's costs of the motion. The Court's decision implicitly determined that the conduct of the Bank did not justify an order for indemnity costs, nor did it necessitate the Court of Appeal making further orders in respect of the Common Law Division proceedings at that stage.
The primary legal issues before the Court were whether the conduct of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia prior to the default judgment, and its conduct as the unsuccessful respondent to the appeal, warranted an order for indemnity costs in favour of the applicants. The Court was also required to consider the applicants' request for the Court to make orders concerning the proceedings in the Common Law Division.
The Court dismissed the notice of motion filed by the applicants on 20 November 2014. Consequently, the applicants were ordered to pay the Bank's costs of the motion. The Court's decision implicitly determined that the conduct of the Bank did not justify an order for indemnity costs, nor did it necessitate the Court of Appeal making further orders in respect of the Common Law Division proceedings at that stage.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Remedies
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Blacktown City Council v Hambly (No 2) [2023] NSWLEC 91
Cases Citing This Decision
7
Frog Swamp Pty Ltd v Statewide Secured Investments Pty Ltd
[2015] NSWCA 376
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Goater
[2016] NSWSC 216
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Goater v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
[2014] NSWCA 382
Harrison v Schipp
[2001] NSWCA 13
NMFM Property Pty Ltd v Citibank Ltd (No 2)
[2001] FCA 480
Cited Sections