[2016] FWCA 2847
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement |
| GO Inshore Pty Ltd |
| (AG2016/3064) |
GO INSHORE PORT HEDLAND ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Maritime industry
| COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 9 MAY 2016 |
Application for approval of the GO INSHORE Port Hedland Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
GO INSHORE Port Hedland Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application
was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Go
Inshore Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to
this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the
employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and
(3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Maritime Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement,
has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance
with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[2016] FWCA 2847
[4] The Agreement was approved on 9 May 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will
operate from 16 May 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 9 May 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE418827 PR580073>
- AGLC
- Go Inshore Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 2847
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2847
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Act had been met, and whether the Agreement was fairly chosen. The Maritime Union of Australia, a bargaining representative for the Agreement, had given notice under section 183 of the Act that it wanted the Agreement to cover it. Commissioner Roe found that the Agreement was approved and would operate from 16 May 2016, with a nominal expiry date of 9 May 2020.
In reaching the decision, Commissioner Roe considered the evidence and submissions presented by the parties. The Commissioner was satisfied that the requirements of the Act had been met and that the Agreement was fairly chosen. The Commissioner noted that the Agreement covered the Maritime Union of Australia, as required by section 201(2) of the Act. The decision was made in accordance with section 54 of the Act, and the Agreement was approved on 9 May 2016.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.