| [2015] FWCA 2663 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
GMA Corporation Pty Ltd
(AG2015/2244)
GMA CORPORATION PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015 - 2018 (GMA EA 2015)
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 20 APRIL 2015 |
Application for approval of the GMA Corporation Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018 (GMA EA 2015).
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the GMA Corporation Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018 (GMA EA 2015) (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by GMA Corporation Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] An undertaking has been provided in the following terms:
“.... Please find attached a letter of compliance from our provider BT super fund which states that the BT Superfund provide a “MySuper Product”.
....
I can therefore confirm that the BT Superfund offers a MySuper fund product.”
[3] As a result, the above undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A full copy of advice provided by the employer is attached to the Agreement as Annexure A.
[4] As the Agreement does not contain a consultation term which meets the requirements of s.205 of the Act, the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 April 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2018.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE413566 PR563205>
- AGLC
- GMA Corporation Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 2663
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 2663
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC examined the process by which the agreement was negotiated, including whether it was done in good faith and whether there was adequate consultation between the parties. It also looked at whether the agreement provided sufficient protections for employees, including provisions on wages, hours of work, and other conditions of employment. The FWC considered submissions from both the company and the employees' representative. Ultimately, the FWC found that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and provided adequate protections for employees.
In reaching its decision, the FWC noted that the company had provided evidence of a thorough negotiation process, and that the employees' representative had been given an opportunity to participate. The FWC also found that the agreement contained provisions that met the minimum standards set out in the Fair Work Act. The FWC approved the enterprise agreement, noting that it provided a fair and reasonable outcome for both the company and its employees. The FWC ordered that the agreement be registered and become legally binding on the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.