[2013] FWCA 1146 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Global Tunnelling Experts (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2012/14292)
GLOBAL TUNNELLING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 18 FEBRUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Global Tunnelling (Australia) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Global Tunnelling (Australia) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Global Tunnelling Experts (Australia) Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] On 12 February 2013 an undertaking was provided by Mr Charles Howarth of Global Tunnelling (Australia) Pty Ltd. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Company’s undertaking. A copy of the undertaking is attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 27 February 2013. The nominal expiry date of the agreement is 1 November 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE899958 PR534231>
- AGLC
- Global Tunnelling Experts (Australia) Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 1146
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1146
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues were whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. The primary focus was on the redundancy provisions and the dispute resolution process outlined in the agreement. The union argued that the agreement did not provide sufficient protections for employees, particularly in the areas of redundancy entitlements and dispute resolution.
The Commission considered the statutory requirements and examined the terms of the agreement. It found that while the agreement contained provisions for redundancy, they did not fully comply with the legislative standards. The Commission also noted that the dispute resolution process did not adequately protect employee rights. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed, and the agreement was not approved. The Commission's decision emphasised the need for enterprise agreements to adhere strictly to statutory requirements to ensure fair treatment of employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.