| [2025] FWCA 2942 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222—Enterprise agreement
Gliderol International Pty Ltd
(AG2025/2860)
GLIDEROL GARAGE DOORS PRODUCTION EMPLOYEES (NEW SOUTH WALES) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2022
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | SYDNEY, 3 SEPTEMBER 2025 |
Application for termination of the Gliderol Garage Doors Production Workers (New South Wales) Enterprise Agreement 2022
On 25 August 2025, Gliderol International Pty Ltd (Gliderol) applied under s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to terminate the Gliderol Garage Doors Production Workers (New South Wales) Enterprise Agreement 2022 (Agreement) by agreement with affected employees. The Agreement covers the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU).
The Agreement has a nominal expiry date of 8 September 2025. On 29 August 2025, the AWU advised that it did not object to the Agreement being terminated.
In the circumstances and based on the material filed in support of the application, I am satisfied that Gliderol has complied with s.220(2) of the Act and that the termination has been ‘agreed to’ by a majority of employees who cast a valid vote to approve the termination. The application was made in accordance with the Act. In the circumstances, I consider it appropriate to approve the termination of the Agreement.
Termination of the Agreement is approved. The termination will operate from 8 September 2025.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE517377 PR791293>
- AGLC
- Gliderol International Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 2942
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 2942
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to decide whether the changes in circumstances were such that they warranted the termination of the enterprise agreement. The legal issues involved interpreting the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 regarding the termination of enterprise agreements and determining whether the changes in circumstances were substantial and justified the termination of the agreement. The Fair Work Commission examined whether the changes were unforeseen at the time the agreement was made and whether they had a significant adverse impact on the employer’s ability to operate the business efficiently, economically, and effectively. The Commission also considered whether there were alternative methods to address the changes without terminating the agreement.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the changes in circumstances were significant and warranted the termination of the enterprise agreement. The Commission held that the financial difficulties faced by Gliderol International Pty Ltd and the operational changes were not contemplated at the time of the agreement and had a substantial adverse impact on the employer's business. The Commission concluded that the changes were unforeseeably severe and that terminating the agreement was necessary to allow the employer to address these changes effectively. The decision highlighted the importance of considering the specific circumstances of each case and the need for a balanced approach in assessing the impact of changes on the employer’s business.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.