| [2015] FWCA 998 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Glenview Capsicums Pty Ltd
(AG2015/165)
GLENVIEW CAPSICUMS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2009
Agricultural industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY | BRISBANE, 11 FEBRUARY 2015 |
Application for variation of the Glenview Capsicums Enterprise Agreement 2009.
[1] An application has been made for a variation of the Glenview Capsicums Enterprise Agreement 2009 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Glenview Capsicums Pty Ltd.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The variation to the Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.216 of the Act, this decision will operate from 11 February 2015. The variation can be found at Annexure A to this decision.
[4] The consolidated version of Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE877195 PR560937>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Glenview Capsicums Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 998
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 998
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were fair and reasonable. This involved assessing if the changes met the criteria for a modern award under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically whether they provided for a fair and efficient workplace while maintaining a balance between the parties' interests. The Commission also had to consider the impact of the changes on the employees and whether the company had adequately justified the need for the modifications.
In its decision, the Commission examined the evidence provided by both parties. It considered the economic context, the company's financial position, and the employees' living standards. The Commission concluded that while some of the proposed changes were justified, others were not reasonable. The Commission varied the enterprise agreement to reflect a balance between the company's needs and the employees' rights. It approved changes to pay rates and work hours but rejected provisions that would have significantly reduced employee entitlements.
The Fair Work Commission varied the Enterprise Agreement 2009 in part, implementing changes to pay rates and work hours while rejecting provisions that would have adversely affected employee entitlements. The Commission's decision balanced the need for workplace efficiency with the protection of employees' rights and conditions of employment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.