Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Glenayr Avenue Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2016] NSWLEC 1023 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 18 September 2015 Date of orders: 01 February 2016 Decision date: 01 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Fakes C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Mixed use development; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Glenayr Avenue Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Waverley Council (Respondent)Representation: Applicant: Mr G Green (Solicitor)
Solicitors:
Respondent: Mr M Staunton (Barrister)
Applicant: Pikes & Verekers Lawyers
Respondent: Wiltshire Webb Staunton Beattie
File Number(s): 10480 of 2015
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
__________________
Judy Fakes
Commissioner of the Court
10480 of 2015 s34 orders (72.6 KB, pdf)
10480 of 2015 Conditions of consent (489 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Glenayr Avenue Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2016] NSWLEC 1023
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1023
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included the interpretation of the development approval granted by the Council, whether the development complied with the approved plans, and whether the Council had acted lawfully in preventing the development. The court had to determine whether the appellant was entitled to proceed with the development as approved or whether the Council's actions were justified.
The court found that the approved plans did not permit the development as proposed by the appellant. It held that the Council had acted within its lawful powers in preventing the development. The court considered the terms of the approval, the relevant planning instruments, and the evidence presented by both parties. It concluded that the appellant's proposed development did not conform to the approved plans and therefore the Council was justified in refusing consent for the development. The court's decision was based on the strict adherence to the approved plans and the requirement for compliance with planning laws.
The Land and Environment Court of New South Wales dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Council's decision to prevent the development. The court's decision was based on a detailed examination of the development approval, the approved plans, and the evidence presented. The appellant was not entitled to proceed with the development as proposed, and the Council's actions were upheld as lawful. The court's ruling ensured that the approved plans and planning laws were upheld, maintaining the integrity of the planning process.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.