Gleeson v Bullock

In *Gleeson v Bullock*, the New South Wales Court of Appeal considered an application for leave to appeal against a decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The precise nature of the dispute between the parties, Gleeson and Bullock, is not detailed in the provided text, nor is the specific decision of the Supreme Court from which leave to appeal was sought.

The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether to grant leave to appeal. This involves assessing whether there is a reasonably arguable case of error in the decision below, or whether the appeal raises a question of general principle or public importance that warrants appellate review.

The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal and dismissed the summons. This outcome indicates that the Court was not satisfied that there were sufficient grounds to permit the appeal to proceed. The reasons for this refusal are not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the dismissal with costs signifies that the unsuccessful applicant bears the costs of the proceedings in the Court of Appeal.