| [2015] FWCA 1401 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.217 - Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty
Gladstone Marine Pilot Services Pty Ltd
(AG2015/1816)
GLADSTONE PILOT TRANSFER CREW AGREEMENT 2014
Port authorities | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 2 MARCH 2015 |
Application for variation of the Gladstone Pilot Transfer Crew Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for variation of the Gladstone Pilot Transfer Crew Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The Gladstone Marine Pilot Services Pty Ltd (the Applicant) made the application pursuant to s.217 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I have examined the material provided by the Applicant in support of its application, together with the consent of Australian Maritime Officers Union (AMOU), and am satisfied that it includes all the relevant information which would be necessary to support the variation of the Agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty.
[3] The application seeks to vary the following:
1. Deleting Clause 11.2; and
2. Replacing Clause 11.2 with the following:
11.2 - Casual Employment
A casual employee will be paid for all hours worked at the rate of the hourly base rate applicable to the classification of work performed under this Agreement, plus a casual loading of 23%.
For the purposes of casual remuneration, applicable hourly rates (inclusive of the casual loading of 23%) are as follows:
Classification | Casual Hourly Rate (1 November 2014) | Casual Hourly Rate (1 November 2015) | Casual Hourly Rate (1 November 2016) |
Coxswain | $44.31073 | $45.86161 | $47.46677 |
Pilot Vessel Master B | $47.83726 | $49.51156 | $51.24446 |
Pilot Vessel Master A | $50.44908 | $52.21480 | $54.04232 |
Assistant Senior Pilot Vessel Master | $55.36257 | $57.30026 | $59.30577 |
Senior Pilot Vessel Master | $57.81962 | $59.84331 | $61.93783 |
[4] On the material provided, I am satisfied that it is appropriate that the application be granted and it is appropriate for the variation to the Agreement to operate from 14 January 2015, being the date of the approval of the Agreement.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE412207 PR561493>
- AGLC
- Gladstone Marine Pilot Services Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 1401
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 1401
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Court had to address were whether the proposed changes were consistent with the principles of procedural fairness and whether they were in the interest of the employees, particularly regarding their working conditions and entitlements. The Court also needed to consider whether the changes would maintain or improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the pilot services provided by the company.
The Court found that the application did not adequately demonstrate how the proposed changes would enhance the efficiency or effectiveness of the pilot services. Additionally, the Court determined that the application did not sufficiently address the potential impact of the changes on the working conditions and entitlements of the pilot transfer crew members. Consequently, the Court rejected the application, emphasising the need for a more comprehensive demonstration of the benefits of the proposed changes. The Court also highlighted the importance of ensuring that any changes to employment agreements are made in accordance with the principles of procedural fairness and in the best interests of the employees.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that the application for variation of the Gladstone Pilot Transfer Crew Agreement 2014 be dismissed. The decision underscores the necessity for any proposed changes to employment agreements to be thoroughly justified, taking into account the interests of both the employer and the employees, as well as the broader operational context.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.