Giurina v Owners Corporation

Case

[2013] VSC 39

18 February 2013


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Giurina v Owners Corporation [2013] VSC 39 [2013] VSC 39 18 February 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Giurina v Owners Corporation, the applicant sought to appeal against a costs order made by an Associate Judge. The matter was heard by the Supreme Court of New South Wales, with the court having to decide whether an extension of time to appeal should be granted. The legal issues involved interpreting the relevant provisions of the Supreme Court Act 1986 and the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005, and applying the principles established in Gallo v Dawson and Simonsen v Legge.

The court examined the relevant statutory provisions and case law, including the requirement for leave to appeal to be sought within 28 days of the order in question, as per section 17A(2)(b) of the Supreme Court Act 1986. It also considered Rule 77.06 of the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005, which provides for the court to extend the time for seeking leave to appeal if it is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the extension. The court weighed the principles established in Gallo v Dawson and Simonsen v Legge, which emphasise the importance of the court exercising its discretion to extend time where there are exceptional circumstances, but also caution against the automatic granting of extensions.

The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated exceptional circumstances warranting an extension of time to appeal. It noted that the applicant had not acted with due diligence in seeking leave to appeal and had failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay. The court concluded that the application to extend time should be refused, and that the principles in Gallo v Dawson and Simonsen v Legge did not apply in the circumstances of this case. The court emphasised that while it is prepared to exercise its discretion to extend time in appropriate cases, it must do so sparingly and only where there are truly exceptional circumstances.

No orders were made in relation to the application to extend time. The applicant was required to pay the respondent's costs of the application, to be taxed if not agreed.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation & Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Limitation Periods

  • Costs

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

18

Giurina v Deak [2018] VSC 409
Cases Cited

6

Statutory Material Cited

0

R v Shannon [2007] VSCA 243