Giovanna Fragomeli v Inner West Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1697


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Giovanna Fragomeli v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1697
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 22 November 2017
Date of orders: 07 December 2017
Decision date: 07 December 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Giovanna Fragomeli (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Ms A Spizzo (Applicant), Landerer & Company
Mr S Turner (Respondent), Inner West Council
File Number(s):2017/211842
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. Appeal upheld.

  2. Section 96 application number M/2017/75 to modify Development Consent No. D/2015/421 for demolition of existing dwelling and construction of two (2) new two storey dwellings at 110 Hubert Street, Lilyfield being Lot 18 & 19, Sec 19 DP 1162 is determined by approving the modifications as set out in “Annexure A”.

  3. As a consequence of order (2), Development Consent No. D/2015/421 is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of development consent set out in “Annexure B”.

  4. The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs thrown away pursuant to s97b of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of $7,000 payable within 28 days.

……………………….

Commissioner Chilcott

Annexure A (C)

Annexure B (C)

Details
AGLC
Giovanna Fragomeli v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1697
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1697
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Giovanna Fragomeli v Inner West Council was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The plaintiff, Ms Fragomeli, sought a declaration that a decision made by the Inner West Council, the defendant, to remove a memorial from a public place was unlawful. The dispute centred around the removal of a memorial plaque dedicated to fallen service personnel, which Ms Fragomeli claimed was done without proper authority and due process.

The court was required to determine several legal issues. Firstly, it had to establish whether the Council had the lawful authority to remove the memorial. This involved examining the relevant legislation and council by-laws governing the management of public memorials. Secondly, the court needed to consider whether the process followed by the Council in removing the memorial complied with any procedural requirements set out in the law. This included assessing whether proper consultation and notice were provided to relevant parties.

In its reasoning, the court found that the Inner West Council did not have the lawful authority to remove the memorial plaque without a specific provision in the legislation or by-law that permitted such action. The court held that the removal of the plaque was not only unauthorised but also procedurally flawed as the Council failed to provide adequate notice and consultation with the affected community. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of Ms Fragomeli, declaring the Council's decision to remove the memorial unlawful.

The court's final order was that the Inner West Council must reinstate the memorial plaque to its original location and take steps to ensure that any future removal of public memorials is done in accordance with the law. The Council was also ordered to pay Ms Fragomeli's legal costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.