| [2018] FWCA 950 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Gilbarco Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2017/6205)
Gilbarco Australia Pty Ltd - NSW Service & Maintenance Agreement 2017
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| Commissioner McKinnon | MELBOURNE, 12 FEBRUARY 2018 |
Application for approval of the Gilbarco Australia Pty Ltd - NSW Service & Maintenance Agreement 2017.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Gilbarco Australia Pty Ltd – NSW Service & Maintenance Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Gilbarco Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 19 February 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 August 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE427326 PR600376>
Appendix A
- AGLC
- Gilbarco Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 950
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 950
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the proposed agreement met the legal requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. Key issues included whether the agreement complied with procedural requirements, such as proper bargaining and notice provisions, and whether it met the substantive requirements, including provisions for minimum entitlements and the avoidance of underpayment. The court also had to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.
The Fair Work Commission found that the application met the procedural requirements and that the agreement was fairly and reasonably negotiated. The court noted that the agreement included provisions for minimum wage rates, classification of employees, and other conditions of employment that were consistent with the Fair Work Act. The court approved the agreement, emphasising the importance of maintaining fair and reasonable terms for both employers and employees.
No further orders were made beyond the approval of the agreement. The decision confirmed that the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the necessary legal standards and was suitable for approval under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.