Ghosh v Ninemsn Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2015] NSWCA 334
•29 October 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Ghosh v Ninemsn Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 334
[2015] NSWCA 334
29 October 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The plaintiff, Ms. Ghosh, appealed to the Court of Appeal of New South Wales against the dismissal of her defamation proceedings against Ninemsn Pty Ltd by a primary judge of the District Court. The proceedings had been dismissed for want of due despatch and for being an abuse of process.
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the primary judge had erred in dismissing the proceedings under rule 12.7 of the *Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005* (NSW) for want of due despatch, and whether the primary judge had erred in finding that the plaintiff's conduct of the litigation constituted an abuse of process.
The Court of Appeal found that the primary judge had not erred. The plaintiff had failed to properly plead her defamation claim and had not adequately responded to requests for particulars. This conduct demonstrated a lack of diligence in prosecuting the proceedings and, when viewed in its entirety, amounted to an abuse of process. The court applied the principles relating to the court's power to dismiss proceedings for want of due despatch and abuse of process, considering the plaintiff's persistent failures to comply with procedural requirements and her inability to articulate a coherent case.
The appeal was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the primary judge had erred in dismissing the proceedings under rule 12.7 of the *Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005* (NSW) for want of due despatch, and whether the primary judge had erred in finding that the plaintiff's conduct of the litigation constituted an abuse of process.
The Court of Appeal found that the primary judge had not erred. The plaintiff had failed to properly plead her defamation claim and had not adequately responded to requests for particulars. This conduct demonstrated a lack of diligence in prosecuting the proceedings and, when viewed in its entirety, amounted to an abuse of process. The court applied the principles relating to the court's power to dismiss proceedings for want of due despatch and abuse of process, considering the plaintiff's persistent failures to comply with procedural requirements and her inability to articulate a coherent case.
The appeal was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Negligence & Tort
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Abuse of Process
-
Appeal
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Ghosh v Ninemsn Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 334
Most Recent Citation
Pastoral Investment Land and Loan Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council [2020] NSWLEC 85
Cases Citing This Decision
135
UBS AG v Tyne
[2018] HCA 45
UBS AG v Tyne
[2018] HCA 45
Ergashova v Aslan
[2025] NSWCA 207
Cases Cited
12
Statutory Material Cited
4
Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd
[2001] NSWCA 274
Ghosh v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd; Ghosh v Ninemsn Pty Ltd (No 4)
[2014] NSWDC 151
Ghosh v Ninemsn Pty Ltd & Ors
[2013] NSWDC 63