Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ghazi Al Ali Architect Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2017] NSWLEC 1589 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 1 and 26 September 2017 Date of orders: 18 October 2017 Decision date: 18 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ghazi Al Ali Architect Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Ku-ring-gai Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr G McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant)
Mr A Hudson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/125232 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to amend their development application in accordance with the plans referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure “A”.
The Appeal is upheld.
Development Application No. DA-0586/16 for a residential flat building comprising 50 units and 48 basement car spaces is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs arising under s97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the amount of $8,750.00 within 28 days from 10 October, 2017.
……………………….
Jenny Smithson
Commissioner
Annexure A (C) (336 KB, pdf)
(Plans) (18.9 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Ghazi Al Ali Architect Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2017] NSWLEC 1589
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1589
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Council's decision to refuse the building permit was lawful and whether the plaintiff's application complied with the relevant planning laws and regulations. The court also needed to determine whether the Council had acted unreasonably or in a procedurally unfair manner when making its decision.
The court examined the relevant planning laws, including the Local Government Act and the applicable planning instruments, to assess whether the plaintiff's application met the necessary criteria for approval. The court found that the Council's decision was based on a proper interpretation of the zoning laws and that the Council had followed the correct procedures in making its decision. The court also concluded that the Council's decision was not unreasonable, given the evidence presented.
ORDERS:
1. The plaintiff's application for special leave to appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of the plaintiff's application are to be paid by the plaintiff.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.