| [2025] FWCA 1929 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
George Weston Foods Ltd Trading AS Tip Top Bakery Springwood
(AG2025/1215)
TIP TOP BAKERY (SPRINGWOOD) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BUTLER | BRISBANE, 13 JUNE 2025 |
Application for approval of the Tip Top Bakery (Springwood) Enterprise Agreement 2024 - 2026
George Weston Foods Ltd trading as Tip Top Bakery Springwood (“the Employer”) has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tip Top Bakery (Springwood) Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2026 (“the Agreement”). The Application was made under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Fair Work Act”). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
A party’s application for the Commission’s approval of an enterprise agreement must be accompanied by a signed copy of that agreement.[1] A copy of an enterprise agreement is a signed copy only if it is signed by the employer covered by the agreement and at least one representative of the employees covered by the agreement, and it includes each signatory’s full name and address, and an explanation of their authority to sign.[2] There was a minor issue with the signature page. The Employer provided a replacement signature page. Also, the application inadvertently named a natural person as the applicant. The Employer confirmed that it was the correct applicant.
I exercise the power in section 586 of the Fair Work Act,[3] under paragraph (a) and/or paragraph (b) of that section, to correct any error in the application, and/or waive any irregularity in the form or manner in which it has been made, arising out of the signature page or the incorrect name of the applicant in the application.
Pre-approval requirements
There is a minor discrepancy as between the Notice of Employee Representational Rights, and the Agreement as made, as to the Agreement’s title. For the purposes of subsection 188(5) I am satisfied that this was a minor technical error and not likely to disadvantage any employees in the circumstances.
Noting clause 1.4 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards (“NES”) in the Fair Work Act will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Employer has given written undertakings in accordance with section 190 of the Fair Work Act. The undertakings are attached as Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that each undertaking is not likely to cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and does not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Each undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
With the undertakings now given, and after having regard to the Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement as well as the application and declarations filed in this matter, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Fair Work Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
The United Workers’ Union (UWU) lodged a declaration in the prescribed form[4] giving notice under s.183 of the Fair Work Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with subsection 201(2) of the Fair Work Act, I note the Agreement covers the UWU.
The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with section 54 of the Fair Work Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 October 2026.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Annexure A
[1] Fair Work Act 2009 s 185(2)(a).
[2] Fair Work Act 2009 s 185(5) and Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) r 2.06A.
[3] See Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (Q.)[2020] FWCFB 848, [128]-[129], applying CFMMEU v Griffiths Cranes Pty Ltd[2019] FWCFB 1717, [40]-[46].
[4] Form F18.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE529316 PR788076>
- AGLC
- George Weston Foods Ltd Trading AS Tip Top Bakery Springwood [2025] FWCA 1929
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 1929
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court centred on whether the proposed agreement met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court had to consider whether the agreement complied with the procedural requirements for enterprise agreements, whether it contained the minimum terms and conditions prescribed by the Fair Work Act, and whether it was in the best interests of the employees covered by the agreement. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees, considering factors such as pay rates, hours of work, and other conditions of employment.
After reviewing the submissions and evidence from both parties, the court found that the proposed agreement complied with all procedural requirements and contained the minimum terms and conditions as prescribed by the Fair Work Act. The court also determined that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. In reaching its decision, the court considered the specific circumstances of the Springwood bakery and its workforce, as well as the broader context of the food manufacturing industry. Based on its findings, the court approved the Tip Top Bakery (Springwood) Enterprise Agreement 2024-2026.
In light of the court's approval, the agreement will now become a legally binding enterprise agreement between George Weston Foods Ltd Trading as Tip Top Bakery and its employees at the Springwood location, effective from the agreed commencement date. The agreement will govern the terms and conditions of employment for the workforce at the Springwood bakery for the duration of the agreement, which is from 2024 to 2026. The court's decision provides certainty and stability for both the employer and employees at the Springwood bakery, ensuring that their employment terms and conditions are fair, reasonable, and in line with the requirements of the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.