Geck and Child Support Registrar (Child support)
Case
•
[2018] AATA 4350
•15 October 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Geck and Child Support Registrar (Child support) [2018] AATA 4350
[2018] AATA 4350
15 October 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal reviewed a decision by the Child Support Registrar concerning the percentage of care for a child. The applicant, Geck, sought to have a previous determination of the percentage of care revoked and a new determination made.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether the Registrar's decision to refuse to revoke the existing percentage of care determination and make a new one was justified. This involved considering whether there had been a change in the pattern of care for the child since the last determination was made.
The Tribunal found that the evidence did not establish a significant change in the pattern of care that would warrant revoking the existing determination and making a new one. The principles applied focused on the threshold required to demonstrate a change in care arrangements sufficient to justify a new assessment under the relevant legislation. The Tribunal affirmed the Registrar's decision.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether the Registrar's decision to refuse to revoke the existing percentage of care determination and make a new one was justified. This involved considering whether there had been a change in the pattern of care for the child since the last determination was made.
The Tribunal found that the evidence did not establish a significant change in the pattern of care that would warrant revoking the existing determination and making a new one. The principles applied focused on the threshold required to demonstrate a change in care arrangements sufficient to justify a new assessment under the relevant legislation. The Tribunal affirmed the Registrar's decision.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Statutory Construction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0