Gaye Pomfret v Sanreef Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWC 2205


[2023] FWC 2205

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy

Gaye Pomfret
v

Sanreef Pty Ltd

(U2023/6804)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 1 SEPTEMBER 2023

Application for relief from unfair dismissal – incomplete application – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative.

  1. On 25 July 2023 Gaye Pomfret (the Applicant) made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. The application was incomplete in that the Applicant did not pay the required fee and attached an incomplete waiver form. The Applicant also did not provide a functioning contact number for the respondent.

  1. On 27 July 2023 the Commission attempted to contact the Applicant on her nominated telephone number to request the missing details. She did not answer the call. A voicemail message was left requesting a completed waiver form and a telephone number for the Respondent.

  1. Later that day, the Commission sent correspondence to the Applicant’s nominated email address asking that she provide further details as the waiver form was blank and the telephone number provided for the respondent was disconnected. That correspondence also advised that if a completed waiver form was not provided within 14 days, the application may be dismissed. 

  1. As the required information was not received, the Commission attempted to contact the Applicant on her nominated telephone number on 8 August 2023. A voicemail message was left requesting a completed waiver form and contact details for the respondent.

  1. To date, no response has been received.

  1. Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:

395 Application fees

(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

(2) The regulations may prescribe:

(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

(b) a method for indexing the fee; and

(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1)   Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a)   the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. In the circumstances where the filing fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received, I have determined that the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR765757>

Details
AGLC
Gaye Pomfret v Sanreef Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 2205
Case
[2023] FWC 2205
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission considered an application from Gaye Pomfret against Sanreef Pty Ltd regarding an unfair dismissal remedy. Pomfret had applied for relief under section 394 of the Fair Work Act 2009. However, the application was incomplete as Pomfret failed to pay the required fee and did not attach a completed waiver form. Additionally, the contact number provided for the respondent was disconnected. Despite attempts by the Commission to contact Pomfret to request the missing details, she did not respond, leading to the application's dismissal.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the application complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act and whether the application could be dismissed under section 587 of the Act. Section 395 of the Act mandates that applications be accompanied by the prescribed fee and a completed waiver form. Section 587(1)(a) allows the Commission to dismiss an application if it is not made in accordance with the Act. The Commission had to determine if Pomfret's application met these criteria and whether the application had any reasonable prospect of success.

The Commission found that Pomfret's application did not comply with the Act as it was incomplete. The failure to pay the required fee and submit a completed waiver form meant the application was not made in accordance with the Act. Given that Pomfret did not respond to multiple attempts to provide the missing information, the Commission concluded that the application had no reasonable prospect of success. Consequently, the application was dismissed under section 587(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act.

The Commission dismissed Pomfret's application for unfair dismissal remedy under section 587(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act. The dismissal was based on the application's non-compliance with the Act due to the unpaid fee and incomplete waiver form. The Commission also noted Pomfret's failure to respond to attempts to provide the missing details, leading to the conclusion that the application had no reasonable prospect of success.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.