| [2015] FWCA 4951 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Gavcon Group Australia Pty Ltd ATF Gavcon Group Australia Investment Trust
(AG2015/3803)
GAVCON GROUP AUSTRALIA PTY LTD. ATF GAVCON GROUP AUSTRALIA INVESTMENT TRUST AND AMWU METAL ENGINEERING ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC | MELBOURNE, 21 JULY 2015 |
Application for approval of the GAVCON GROUP AUSTRALIA PTY LTD. ATF GAVCON GROUP AUSTRALIA INVESTMENT TRUST and AMWU Metal Engineering On-Site Construction Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the GAVCON GROUP AUSTRALIA PTY LTD. ATF GAVCON GROUP AUSTRALIA INVESTMENT TRUST and AMWU Metal Engineering On-Site Construction Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Gavcon Group Australia Pty Ltd ATF Gavcon Group Australia Investment Trust. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 July 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE414900 PR569635>
- AGLC
- Gavcon Group Australia Pty Ltd ATF Gavcon Group Australia Investment Trust [2015] FWCA 4951
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 4951
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the proposed AMWU Metal Engineering On-Site Construction Agreement 2014 met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement provided employees with terms and conditions that were at least as good as those provided by the Metal Industry Award 2010, and whether it was better off overall for the employees. The Commission also needed to consider whether any provisions in the agreement that were less favourable than the award were justifiable under section 235 of the Act.
The Fair Work Commission held that the proposed agreement did not meet the "better off overall test" as required by section 230 of the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the proposed agreement contained provisions that were less favourable than the Metal Industry Award 2010 and could not be justified under section 235 of the Act. Consequently, the application for approval of the agreement was dismissed. The Commission concluded that the proposed agreement did not provide employees with terms and conditions that were at least as good as those provided by the relevant award and were better off overall. As a result, the application was not approved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.