Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gartner Trovato Architects v Northern Beaches Council [2023] NSWLEC 1461 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 14 July 2023 Date of orders: 17 August 2023 Decision date: 17 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) Modification Application No. 2023/0212 seeking consent to modify child place numbers from 71 to 88 is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
(2) Development consent N0200/16 which granted consent for demolition of existing structures and construction of a part single and part two storey building for use as a child care centre with basement parking at 30 Queens Parade, Newport as modified by the Court is Annexure B.
Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – modification of approved centre based child care centre by increase in child place numbers – conciliation conference – agreement reached – orders made
Legislation Cited: Education and Care Services National Regulations 2011, regs 107, 108
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4.55
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, s 113
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34
New South Wales Government Gazette, No 501, 1 October 2021
State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, s 3.23
Cases Cited: Feldkirchen Pty Ltd v Development Implementation Pty Ltd (2022) 254 LGERA 114; [2022] NSWCA 227
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gartner Trovato Architects (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Staunton (Applicant)
C Gough (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Sattler & Associates (Applicant)
Storey & Gough (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/109734 Publication restriction: No
JUDGMENT
-
COMMISSIONER: This judgment concerns an application to modify development consent N0200/16 issued by the Court. That development consent granted consent for demolition of existing structures and construction of a part single and part two storey building for use as a child care centre with basement parking at 30 Queens Parade, Newport. The Modification Application 2023/0212 was made by way of a Class 1 Application filed with the Land and Environment Court on 5 April 2023 pursuant to s 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act). The modification application, as amended, seeks to increase the number of child care places at the centre from 71 to 88.
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference between the parties, pursuant to s 34(1)(a) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). The conciliation conference commenced on 14 July 2023. I presided over the conciliation conference.
-
Following the conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the LEC Act was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. The final signed agreement was filed on 4 August 2023, following the approval by the Council of an amendment to the modification application, pursuant to s 113(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 (EPA Regulation 2021). The amended Modification Application was uploaded onto the NSW Planning Portal on 4 August 2023.
-
As the presiding Commissioner, I am satisfied that the decision is one that the Court can make in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the LEC Act). I form this state of satisfaction on the basis that:
The modification was made by the owners of the land: BTNP Pty Limited.
I am satisfied that the development, to which the consent as modified relates, is quantitatively and qualitatively substantially the same development as the development for which consent was originally granted, satisfying s 4.56(1)(a) of the EPA Act. The modification application maintains the approved use, undertakes no physical modifications to the development and I am satisfied that the increase in child place numbers does not so alter the development such as to render it not substantially the same.
The Modification application, in its original form, was advertised and notified to adjoining and nearby landowners in accordance with Council’s notification policy from 4 to 18 May 2023, satisfying s 4.56(1)(b) of the EPA Act. The notification covered the same scope as that undertaken for the original consent satisfying s 4.56(1)(c) of the EPA Act. Council received 38 submissions objecting to the proposal. The submissions raised matters to do with traffic and parking impacts, Acoustic impacts, emergency evacuation procedures and safety of children attending Newport Public School. In addition, oral submissions were provided by residents as part of the onsite view.
I am satisfied that the matters raised in submissions have been considered as required by s 4.56(1)(d) of the EPA Act and, where appropriate, have resulted in amendments or the imposition of conditions.
Under s 4.56(1A) of the EPA Act, the consent authority must also take into consideration:
Such of the matters referred to in s 4.15(1) as are of relevance to the development the subject of the application; and
The reasons given by the consent authority for the grant of the consent that is sought to be modified.
Pursuant to s 4.56(1A) of the EPA Act in determining the development, I have taken into consideration the matters referred to in s 4.15(1) of the EPA Act that are of relevance to the development which preclude the approval of the Modification Application. For completeness I note:
That the amendments proposed by the Modification Application do not generate unreasonable impacts which preclude approval.
By reference to the Modification Application documents, I am satisfied that the provisions of s 3.23 of State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport & Infrastructure) 2021 (SEPP TI) are met. In determining the modification application, I have taken into consideration the applicable provisions of the Child Care Planning Guideline. Further, I am satisfied that despite the increase in place numbers, the requirements of regs 107 and 108 of the Education and Care Services National Regulations for indoor and outdoor space requirements are met and concurrence is not required.
In determining the Modification Application, I have taken into consideration the suitability of the site for the development, the submissions received and the public interest.
Further, in determining the development, I have taken into consideration the reasons given by the consent authority for the grant of the consent that is sought to be modified. No reasons were given for the grant of the consent that was sought to be modified: Feldkirchen Pty Ltd v Development Implementation Pty Ltd (2022) 254 LGERA 114; [2022] NSWCA 227 at [63]-[77].
-
The Court notes that:
Northern Beaches Council, as the relevant consent authority, has agreed, pursuant to cl 38 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 to the Applicant amending Modification Application 2023/0212 to rely upon the following plans and documents:
Drawing
Date
Prepared By
Site Analysis DA-02 D
7.6. 2023
Gartner Trovato Architects
Site Plan and Landscaped Space DA-03 E
7.6.2023
Gartner Trovato Architects
Basement Plan DA-04 E
7.6.2023
Gartner Trovato Architects
Driveway Plan & Section DA-05 E
6.3. 2023
Gartner Trovato Architects
Ground Floor Plan DA-06 G
7.6. 2023
Gartner Trovato Architects
Upper Floor Plan DA-07 C
6.3. 2023
Gartner Trovato Architects
Sections and Street Elevation DA-08 E
7.6. 2023
Gartner Trovato Architects
Elevations DA-09 D
7.6. 2023
Gartner Trovato Architects
Document
Date
Prepared By
Supplemental Statement of Environmental Effects
29 June 2023
Boston Blyth Fleming
Plan of Management
18 July 2023
Blueys Treehouse
Emergency Procedures report
undated
Beawear Solutions Pty Limited
-
The Court orders that:
Modification Application No. 2023/0212 seeking consent to modify child place numbers from 71 to 88 is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
Development consent N0200/16 which granted consent for demolition of existing structures and construction of a part single and part two storey building for use as a child care centre with basement parking at 30 Queens Parade, Newport as modified by the Court is Annexure B.
D Dickson
Commissioner of the Court
- AGLC
- Gartner Trovato Architects v Northern Beaches Council [2023] NSWLEC 1461
- Case
- [2023] NSWLEC 1461
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the proposed modification of the approved development consent was consistent with the objectives of the relevant planning scheme and whether it complied with the conditions attached to the original consent. The Court had to determine if the modification would result in a significant change to the approved development that would require additional review and approval processes.
In reaching its decision, the Court examined the evidence presented regarding the need for the modification and the potential impact on the surrounding area. The Court found that the proposed increase in the number of children accommodated by the childcare centre was consistent with the objectives of the planning scheme and would not result in a significant change to the approved development. The Court was satisfied that the modification would not adversely affect the environment or the amenity of the surrounding area. As such, the Court granted the modification application, subject to certain conditions designed to mitigate any potential negative impacts.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders that:
(1) Modification Application No. 2023/0212 seeking consent to modify child place numbers from 71 to 88 is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
(2) Development consent N0200/16 which granted consent for demolition of existing structures and construction of a part single and part two storey building for use as a child care centre with basement parking at 30 Queens Parade, Newport as modified by the Court is Annexure B.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.