| [2014] FWCA 8190 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Garden Village Port Macquarie
(AG2014/9480)
GARDEN VILLAGE PORT MACQUARIE, NSWNMA AND HSU NSW ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2017
Aged care industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 18 NOVEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Garden Village Port Macquarie, NSWNMA and HSU NSW Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Garden Village Port Macquarie, NSWNMA and HSU NSW Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Garden Village Port Macquarie. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Health Services Union New South Wales Branch, the New South Wales Branch of the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and the New South Wales Nurses and Midwives’ Association, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE411204 PR557868>
- AGLC
- Garden Village Port Macquarie [2014] FWCA 8190
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 8190
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the enterprise agreement provided adequate protections for employees, particularly in relation to work arrangements, rostering, and shift penalties. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement contained appropriate safeguards to ensure that the employees' rights and entitlements were preserved. This included assessing the agreement's provisions on shift work, overtime, and penalties for refusing to work outside of agreed rostered hours.
In its decision, the Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that employees were not disadvantaged by the proposed changes. The Commission found that while the enterprise agreement contained several beneficial provisions for the employees, some areas required clarification and improvement to adequately protect the employees' rights. The Commission ultimately approved the agreement, subject to specific modifications to address the identified concerns. These modifications included clearer provisions on rostering and shift penalties, ensuring that employees were not unfairly penalised for refusing to work outside their agreed hours.
The Fair Work Commission's decision highlights the importance of carefully reviewing enterprise agreements to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act and the protection of employees' rights. The Commission's approval of the agreement, subject to modifications, demonstrates its commitment to balancing the interests of both employers and employees while upholding the principles of fair work.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.