Ganem and Ganem (No 5)

The Family Court of Australia, constituted by Rees J, considered an application brought by the applicant pursuant to section 112AP of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). The specific nature of the dispute between the applicant and the respondent is not detailed in the provided text, beyond the fact that it concerned an application filed on 19 July 2013.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant's application, made under section 112AP of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth), should be granted. The Court was required to determine the merits of this application and whether it met the necessary legal threshold for success.

The Court dismissed the applicant's application. While the reasoning behind this dismissal is not elaborated upon in the provided text, the outcome indicates that the applicant failed to satisfy the Court of the grounds upon which the application was made. Consequently, the Court ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application, to be assessed or agreed on a party and party basis.