GALDES & HOLDING

Case

[2013] FamCA 519

12 April 2013


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
GALDES & HOLDING [2013] FamCA 519 [2013] FamCA 519 12 April 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of GALDES & HOLDING, Collier J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered parenting orders concerning a child born in 2009. The dispute involved the arrangements for the child's care and contact with her parents.

The court was required to determine the specific parenting orders that would best serve the child's welfare and best interests. This included establishing parental responsibility, the child's living arrangements, and the nature and extent of the father's time with the child, including supervised contact and progressively increasing unsupervised time. The court also had to address communication protocols between the parents, restrictions on denigration, and the exchange of information regarding the child's health and education.

Collier J discharged all existing parenting orders and made new orders. The mother was granted sole parental responsibility, with the child to live with her. The father was to be registered on the child's birth certificate. The court detailed a phased approach to the father's time with the child, commencing with supervised contact and gradually transitioning to unsupervised time, including specific arrangements for school holidays and weekends. The orders also included provisions for the father to be informed of decisions affecting the child's long-term care, education, and health, and for each parent to obtain information directly from the child's educational and health providers. Injunctions were made restraining each parent from denigrating the other in the child's presence and restraining the father from approaching within 500 metres of the mother's residence. All outstanding applications and cross-applications were dismissed.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

Legal Concepts

  • Injunction

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Costs

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

6

Statutory Material Cited

7

Stott & Holgar [2017] FamCAFC 152
Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34
Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 36