GALANIS & MACRIS (No.2)

Case

[2015] FCCA 2729

30 June 2015


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Galanis and Macris (No.2) [2015] FCCA 2729 [2015] FCCA 2729 30 June 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of GALANIS & MACRIS (No.2), Judge Scarlett of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia made orders concerning the property settlement between the Applicant Wife and the Respondent Husband. The dispute involved the division of various assets, including real estate, motor vehicles, personal property, financial investments, and superannuation interests.

The court was required to determine the appropriate distribution of the parties' property interests. This involved assessing the value of the assets and liabilities and making orders for their division, including the transfer of ownership of specific properties and the payment of a lump sum. The court also considered the need to ensure that the orders could be effectively implemented, including provisions for the execution of necessary documents.

Judge Scarlett ordered the Respondent Husband to pay the Applicant Wife $400,000 within three months. The court declared the Wife to be the sole owner of Property S, and the Husband to be the sole owner of Properties A1 and A2. Ownership of motor vehicles was to be determined by their registration or possession. Each party was to retain exclusive ownership of personal property, shares, cash, life assurance policies, and superannuation funds registered or held in their sole names. To facilitate the execution of these orders, the Registrar of the Court was appointed to execute any necessary documents on behalf of a party who failed or refused to do so within fourteen days of being requested.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Equity & Trusts

Legal Concepts

  • Remedies

  • Costs

  • Injunction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

2

GALANIS & MACRIS (No.3) [2015] FCCA 2744
Macris & Galanis [2015] FamCAFC 234
Cases Cited

3

Statutory Material Cited

2

Galanis & Macris [2015] FCCA 2567
Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52
Hickey & Hickey [2003] FamCA 395