Further application of Petronella Boege pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
Case
•
[2015] NSWSC 1925
•15 December 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Further application of Petronella Boege pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2015] NSWSC 1925
[2015] NSWSC 1925
15 December 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Petronella Boege sought leave to appeal a decision to dismiss her application for leave to appeal against a conviction for drug importation. The application was made under section 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW). This was Boege's second application under this section. The court had to decide if there was a doubt or question as to her guilt, or as to any mitigating circumstances in the case, or as to any part of the evidence in the case. These questions were framed under section 133 of the Justices Act 1902 (NSW).
The court considered whether there was any doubt as to Boege's guilt, or as to any mitigating circumstances in the case, or as to any part of the evidence in the case. The court noted that the original application for leave to appeal had been dismissed because there was no reasonable prospect that an appeal would succeed. The court also noted that there were no new grounds of appeal put forward by Boege. The court concluded that there was no doubt as to Boege's guilt, or as to any mitigating circumstances in the case, or as to any part of the evidence in the case. The court found that there was no reasonable prospect that an appeal would succeed. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
The court dismissed Boege's application for leave to appeal.
The court considered whether there was any doubt as to Boege's guilt, or as to any mitigating circumstances in the case, or as to any part of the evidence in the case. The court noted that the original application for leave to appeal had been dismissed because there was no reasonable prospect that an appeal would succeed. The court also noted that there were no new grounds of appeal put forward by Boege. The court concluded that there was no doubt as to Boege's guilt, or as to any mitigating circumstances in the case, or as to any part of the evidence in the case. The court found that there was no reasonable prospect that an appeal would succeed. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
The court dismissed Boege's application for leave to appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Limitation Periods
-
Res Judicata
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Application by Petronella Boege pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (No 6) [2025] NSWSC 195
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Application by Petronella Boege pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (No 6)
[2025] NSWSC 195
Application by Petronella Boege pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
[2017] NSWSC 935
The State of New South Wales v Manna
[2017] NSWSC 463
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
3
Craven v Registrar of NSW Court of Appeal
[1995] HCATrans 335
Sim v Magistrate Corbett
[2006] NSWSC 665
Sim v Magistrate Corbett
[2006] NSWSC 665