Further Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 19 September 2018 Summary

FURTHER AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 19 SEPTEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
NTP

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link
Cain Jeremiah Dunning
v
State of Tasmania and anor

10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Kayne Quinn

3:00 p.m.
For Mention by video link
NMM

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Ashton Mitchell Gill
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing

Timothy Lee King
Braedon Isaac Males
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Civil Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.
For Decision via video link to Court 2,
Cameron Street, Launceston
Jai Simmons
v
Rowan Elizabeth Morphett

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
James MP Fitzgerald
v
Constable Alisha Barnes

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via Video Link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Lai Le
Zachary Dylan Wright
Bradley Daniel Ford

For Directions Hearing via Video Link
to Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
JB

For Directions Hearing
Cameron James Riley
Thomas Ezekiel Ricketts
Monique Rose Lynch
Daniel John Ernest Dadson
Leigh Douglas Monks
Nathaniel Hendrik Brouwer
Brendan David Cranston
Christopher Richard Stevenson
Rachel Ellen Morgan

For Bail Consent
ADES
JSP
Justin Andrew Leary
Jamie Leigh Fewkes

11:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jordan Anthony Stuart
Joshua Edward Peter Darling

For Trial
MDR

4:00 p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Justin Richard Maynard

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Shannon Rainbird

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45am For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Cain Jeremiah Dunning v State of Tasmania and anor.

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Bail Consent
Jayantha Kumara Dewage Don
Frederick James Clay
Mark Anthony Carr
Dwayne Albert Cashman

Civil Jurisdiction

4:15pm For Decision
Wayne Milner v Acting Sergeant Michael Bonde

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15pm For Mention
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction

9:30am For Decision via video link from
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Jai Simmons v Rowan Elizabeth Morphett

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Troy Andrew Martin

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Jason Paul Fitzpatrick
Kevin John Fitzpatrick
DPH
Shane Peter Anderson
Joshua John Chettle

For Trial
Samuel Jake Wyllie
(part-heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

NTP

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The matter before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved a dispute between the State of Tasmania and several individuals. The individuals were charged with various criminal offences and some had applied for bail. The Supreme Court of Tasmania was responsible for hearing the bail applications and other related matters. The court convened in different locations, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie, to accommodate the various cases.

The legal issues before the court included determining the eligibility of the applicants for bail, assessing the merits of the applications, and ensuring that the proceedings were conducted in accordance with the law. The court had to consider factors such as the nature and seriousness of the charges, the likelihood of the applicants attending court, and the potential risk to the community if the applicants were released on bail.

The court heard arguments from both the applicants and the prosecution, and considered the evidence presented. The court found that some of the applicants were eligible for bail, subject to certain conditions, while others were denied bail. The court's decision was based on a careful consideration of the relevant legal principles and the facts of each case.

The court made orders in relation to the bail applications, and also scheduled further hearings for some of the cases. The orders were made in accordance with the law and the court's discretion. The final orders of the court will be reflected in the court's records and will be available for inspection by the parties involved.

Further Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 19 September 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established