| [2018] FWCA 2790 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Frost Catering Equipment Pty Ltd T/A Frost Catering
(AG2017/6553)
FROST CATERING EQUIPMENT PTY LTD WORKPLACE AGREEMENT 2017
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 17 MAY 2018 |
Application for approval of the Frost Catering Equipment Pty Ltd Workplace Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Frost Catering Equipment Pty Ltd Workplace Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Frost Catering Equipment Pty Ltd T/A Frost Catering. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 May 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 16 May 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE428401 PR607196>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Frost Catering Equipment Pty Ltd T/A Frost Catering [2018] FWCA 2790
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 2790
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC carefully examined the contents of the proposed agreement, considering both statutory and enterprise-specific terms. The court assessed if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, ensuring that it did not disadvantage the employees. The FWC also looked into whether the agreement would result in employees being "better off overall" when compared to the applicable award or registered agreement. This involved evaluating the financial implications, benefits, and working conditions proposed in the agreement.
After thorough consideration, the FWC found that the proposed agreement did not meet all the necessary requirements for approval. The court highlighted deficiencies in certain terms and the failure to adequately satisfy the better off overall test. Consequently, the FWC did not grant approval for the Workplace Agreement 2017. The court's decision underscored the importance of ensuring that all terms are comprehensive and that employees are genuinely better off under the proposed conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.