Freeman v Sherwood
Case
•
[1999] NSWCA 172
•5 March 1999
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Freeman v Sherwood [1999] NSWCA 172
[1999] NSWCA 172
5 March 1999
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal concerned a motor vehicle accident and the subsequent claim for damages. The appellant, Freeman, sought to appeal a decision made by a trial judge. The respondents were Sherwood.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the trial judge had erred in finding that there was no breach of duty of care by the respondent, Sherwood, which would have entitled the appellant, Freeman, to damages.
The Court of Appeal, comprising Priestley, Meagher and Handley JJA, reviewed the evidence and the findings of the trial judge. Their Honours concluded that the trial judge had correctly applied the principles of negligence and that there was no basis to interfere with the finding that Sherwood had not breached any duty of care owed to Freeman. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the trial judge had erred in finding that there was no breach of duty of care by the respondent, Sherwood, which would have entitled the appellant, Freeman, to damages.
The Court of Appeal, comprising Priestley, Meagher and Handley JJA, reviewed the evidence and the findings of the trial judge. Their Honours concluded that the trial judge had correctly applied the principles of negligence and that there was no basis to interfere with the finding that Sherwood had not breached any duty of care owed to Freeman. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Negligence & Tort
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
-
Costs
-
Breach
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Freeman v Sherwood [1999] NSWCA 172
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0