Fowles and Fowles (No 5)
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 929
•16 November 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Fowles and Fowles (No 5) [2018] FamCA 929
[2018] FamCA 929
16 November 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Fowles and Fowles (No 5)*, Bennett J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application by the wife for orders to restrain the husband from leaving Australia and to deliver up his passports pending the finalisation of financial proceedings.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to grant an injunction restraining the husband from departing the Commonwealth of Australia and to continue holding his passports in the Court's registry. The Court also addressed the procedure for the parties to make submissions regarding costs.
Bennett J granted the wife leave to make an oral application for the restraining orders. The Court reasoned that such orders were necessary to ensure the husband's presence within Australia for the conclusion of the financial proceedings. Consequently, the husband was restrained by injunction from departing Australia without further order, and his passports, previously deposited with the Court, were ordered to remain in the registry for safekeeping. The Court also established a detailed process for the parties to file written submissions concerning costs, including specific page limits and requirements for itemised costs, with a provision for oral submissions or clarification if sought.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to grant an injunction restraining the husband from departing the Commonwealth of Australia and to continue holding his passports in the Court's registry. The Court also addressed the procedure for the parties to make submissions regarding costs.
Bennett J granted the wife leave to make an oral application for the restraining orders. The Court reasoned that such orders were necessary to ensure the husband's presence within Australia for the conclusion of the financial proceedings. Consequently, the husband was restrained by injunction from departing Australia without further order, and his passports, previously deposited with the Court, were ordered to remain in the registry for safekeeping. The Court also established a detailed process for the parties to file written submissions concerning costs, including specific page limits and requirements for itemised costs, with a provision for oral submissions or clarification if sought.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Fowles & Fowles (No 2) [2021] FedCFamC1F 209
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Fowles & Fowles
[2021] FamCA 368
Fowles and Fowles (No 2)
[2019] FamCA 1027
Fowles & Fowles (No 4)
[2023] FedCFamC1F 819
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
4
Morris, John Joseph v Federated Liquor and Allied Industries Union of Australia Morris, J.J. v Morris, W. & ors
[1978] FCA 80
Shan & Prasad
[2018] FamCAFC 12