Fossey and Fossey
Case
•
[2007] FamCA 889
•18 July 2007
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Fossey and Fossey [2007] FamCA 889
[2007] FamCA 889
18 July 2007
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties to this matter were a husband and wife. The dispute concerned an application filed on 19 June 2007 and a response filed on 16 July 2007, the precise nature of which is not detailed in the provided text, but which were ultimately dismissed by the court. The decision was made by Loughnan JR.
The court was required to determine the disposition of the application and response filed by the parties. Additionally, the court had to consider the issue of costs associated with the proceedings.
The court made orders in terms of a document identified as Exhibit A. The court further ordered that the application and response be dismissed. In relation to costs, the court ordered that the wife pay to the husband's solicitor one half of the husband's costs of and incidental to the proceedings, assessed at $1,607. This payment was to be made within seven days of any final settlement of property between the parties, whether by agreement or by contested proceedings.
The court was required to determine the disposition of the application and response filed by the parties. Additionally, the court had to consider the issue of costs associated with the proceedings.
The court made orders in terms of a document identified as Exhibit A. The court further ordered that the application and response be dismissed. In relation to costs, the court ordered that the wife pay to the husband's solicitor one half of the husband's costs of and incidental to the proceedings, assessed at $1,607. This payment was to be made within seven days of any final settlement of property between the parties, whether by agreement or by contested proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Fossey and Fossey [2007] FamCA 889
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1