Forsburg and Stubbs

In *Forsburg and Stubbs*, heard by Judge Betts, the wife’s application filed on 16 May 2019 was dismissed. The husband’s costs in relation to this application were reserved, and a previously scheduled conciliation conference for 26 June 2019 was vacated. The matter was subsequently adjourned to a new conciliation conference before Registrar Clarke on 23 August 2019.

The central legal issue before the court was the wife's application, the nature of which is not detailed in the provided text, but the court's decision to dismiss it indicates it did not meet the necessary legal threshold for success. The court was required to determine whether the wife’s application should be granted or dismissed.

The court's reasoning for dismissing the wife's application is not elaborated upon in the provided text. However, the outcome signifies that the wife failed to establish grounds for her application to succeed. The reservation of costs for the husband suggests that the court considered the possibility of an order for costs against the wife, but deferred a final decision on this aspect. The adjournment to a new conciliation conference indicates that the broader proceedings between the parties are ongoing.