[2013] FWCA 6502 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
FormAction Concrete Civils Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2538)
FORMACTION CONCRETE CIVILS PTY LTD GREATER NAMMULDI PROJECT AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 9 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the FormAction Concrete Civils Pty Ltd Greater Nammuldi Project AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the FormAction Concrete Civils Pty Ltd Greater Nammuldi Project AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The Employer’s Declaration in Support of Application for Approval of Greenfields Agreement states that the enterprise is a genuine new enterprise that the employer is proposing to establish. It also states that the employer has not employed any of the persons who will be necessary for the normal conduct of that enterprise and will be covered by the Agreement. I am therefore satisfied that the requirements of s.172 (2) (b) have been met and as a consequence the Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is one year and six months from the date of operation.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE403692 PR541187>
- AGLC
- FormAction Concrete Civils Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 6502
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 6502
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees covered by it. The AWU argued that the agreement was not in the best interests of the employees, citing issues with the proposed classification of employees and the terms relating to pay and conditions. The applicant argued that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees as it provided for improved terms and conditions of employment and better job security.
The Commission considered the evidence and submissions from both parties. The Commission found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees as it provided for improved terms and conditions of employment, including higher wages and better working conditions. The Commission also noted that the agreement provided for better job security and the opportunity for employees to be involved in decision-making processes. The Commission approved the agreement under section 233 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.